Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Yards. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and you may Peoples Choices, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Yards. (2000). The spot of attachment inside people mating. Breakdown of Standard Therapy, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, An effective. (2002). Websites paradox reviewed. Diary from Societal Products, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites paradox: A social technical one to decrease personal engagement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, Roentgen.Yards., & Industries, J. Yards. (2001). Amount, timing, and you will duration of marriages and you can divorces. Newest Inhabitants Account, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional data out-of intimacy, hobbies, and you can commitment: Investigations brand new presumptions of the triangular theory of like. Emotional Profile, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step three.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Feeling finest on carrying out bad: Social evaluations in this close matchmaking. Log from Identity and you may Social Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, Islandsk kvindelige personals J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A great., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The latest implicit knowledge out of close competition. Journal regarding Identity and Personal Therapy, 97(1), 74–87.
Good. (2001)mitment and you can relationship repair mechanisms
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A great., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention in order to attractive choices: New progressed psychology from dating fix. Evolution and you can People Conclusion, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential analysis out-of disagreement and you may accord in distressed and you may nondistressed marital couples. Log away from Asking and you may Clinical Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A beneficial., Green, A beneficial. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Relationships formation on the web: What’s the big destination? Log out-of Public Issues, 58(1), 9–31.
The benefits of confident illusions: Idealization in addition to framework away from fulfillment for the intimate relationships
Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-comparison purposes in the personal relationship: A type of internationally improvement and you can certain confirmation. When you look at the P. Noller & J. A great. Feeney (Eds.), Wisdom ents on examination of few communication (pp. 32–58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge School Push.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the client-specialist thread from the contact lens out-of accessory concept. Psychotherapy: Theory, Look, Habit, Knowledge, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The newest societal keeping track of program: Increased sensitivity to societal cues as the an adaptive response to public exception. Into the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The new social outcast: Ostracism, social exemption, getting rejected, and you can intimidation (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Mindset Force.
Enter, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). Internationally and you will certain relational habits from the exposure to public relations. Diary away from Character and you may Personal Mindset, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. Good., Tran, S., ). Accessory and you will guidance trying inside romantic dating. Character and you can Personal Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you will particular attachment representations in the adulthood: Is there a love?. Diary Out-of Social And personal Dating, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. Into the J. Harvey & An excellent. Wenzel (Eds.), Personal intimate relationships: Restoration and you will improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A good. D. (2000). Projection privately feeling certainly one of spouses due to the fact a purpose of the latest similarity within common event. Identity And you can Public Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Negative effects of salience out-of extrinsic rewards toward liking and you can loving. Journal from Character and you can Personal Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.